The goal of the war on Syria has never been to help Syrians, it’s always been about removing a government not compliant with Washington. On 21 October 2013, the New York Times, as usual, helped spread US regime change propaganda:
“A principal goal of the peace conference, which is expected to be held next month in Geneva, although no date has been set, is the establishment of a transitional government “by mutual consent” of Syrians that would not include Mr. Assad.” (1)
This statement from NYT is simply not true – the removal of President Assad has never been accepted as a goal of Geneva II. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov confirmed this in January:
“Assad’s departure could not be a prerequisite for the solution of the Syrian crisis …
our partners look at Assad’s leaving office as a crucial prerequisite. However, such a condition was not placed on the Geneva agreement.” (2)
In January 2013, data relayed to NATO asserted that 70 percent of Syrians support the Assad Government (3). Ignoring this, and ignoring the presence of an internal opposition in Syria, Kerry, yesterday, continued with regime change rhetoric:
“Now I don’t know anyone who believes the opposition will ever consent to Bashar al-Assad being part of that [transitional] government,” Kerry said. “And if he [Bashar al-Assad] thinks he’s going to solve problems by running for re-election I can say to him, I think with certainty, this war will not end as long as that’s the case or he [Assad] is there.” (4)
So, according to Kerry the war against Syria “will not end” unless Assad goes.
Syria has a government, a government which has managed, with the help of the Syrian people, to fend off an invasion of foreign extremists backed by the world’s most powerful nations. Elections are going to be held in Syria in 2014 when the Syrian people, not the US, will decide who they want as president.
It’s the US administration’s insistence on regime change which is the biggest obstacle to peace in Syria, not the Syrian Government who have emphasised their willingness to attend Geneva II “without preconditions”. (5)
(1) http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/22/world/middleeast/qaeda-affiliate-in-syria-is-undermining-peace-efforts-us-official-says.html?_r=0
(2) http://www.aa.com.tr/en/news/121456–russia-no-precondition-on-assad
(3) http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/05/31/nato-data-assad-winning-the-war-for-syrians-hearts-and-minds/
(4) http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/10/22/330655/kerry-syria-face-more-war-if-assad-stays/
(5) http://sana.sy/eng/21/2013/10/02/505543.htm
.
Pro-government demonstrations in Damascus, March 2011
You must be logged in to post a comment.